That threw me for a loop.
If you've read my About Me, you know that most of the things that I tend to study and read about for fun in history are European history - in fact, at this same moment, I am researching and writing a term paper for a class on the French Revolution, which is what I would like to specialize in during graduate school. Choosing that particular topic was relatively easy - I was able to come up with a couple of topics and wound up choosing the political fashions of Marie Antoinette and Georgiana, Duchess of Devonshire. They will probably turn up multiple times during my discussion of term paper research throughout the process, as I wind up doing research for both papers.
Lady Georgiana Spencer, Duchess of Devonshire - Thomas Gainsborough |
My two all-time favorite presidents are Thomas Jefferson and Abraham Lincoln. So, I quickly narrowed my possible topics down to the two of them. I asked myself what it was about the two of them that fascinated me so much - why Jefferson? Why Lincoln?
Thomas Jefferson - Third President of the United States and Most Adorable Nerd |
Abraham Lincoln - The Glue that Held the Union Together |
After a long train of thought, I decided that my topic would be the Lincoln assassination, the chase for the assassins, and their trials and executions - a topic that, if necessary, I shrink after talking with my professor.
Then it came time to look at what I needed to do for research. The previous semester, I wrote a term paper on the influence of the mistress on court life at Louis XIV's Versailles, so I am very familiar with our ILL (interlibrary loan) system. I decided that the best course of action would be to turn to Swanson and see what he had listed in his bibliography, and see how many of those books were available at Spring Hill. After that, I could start looking for ebooks through my public library back home, primary sources through the National Archives, and maybe even microfiche newspaper announcements in the archives at nearby universities. A biography of the assassin, John Wilkes Booth, might not be a bad place to start, in order to gain an understanding of his actions. This might be where I start this weekend.
But first, I think I'll go back to the beginning - time to reread Manhunt. I'm looking forward to research!
Manhunt cover art - my first source for my paper! |
UPDATE: After discussion with my professor, I have narrowed my topic down to Mary Surratt, her involvement in the plot, and he subsequent trial. Surratt was the only woman tried among the conspirators, and was executed along with them for supposedly aiding and abetting John Wilkes Booth in his plot to assassinate the president. I have never found the evidence against Surratt very convincing, however - in fact, I have always felt that the military tribunal that tried the conspirators was attempting to try Booth in absentia through the figures of the conspirators, since Boston Corbett had killed Booth before he could be tried. I think of all the figures, Surratt's trial is the most fascinating, and I look forward eagerly to diving into my research!
This was a long and interesting read, as yours usually are Angeline!
ReplyDeleteI think you will write a great paper since you've already found a "filter" in Mary Surratt and have narrowed the scope of your research. I think that if I write about the Lincoln assassination, I would like to use Dr. Mudd as a filter, and look at how his role in the assassination led to a new standard of medical ethics (the hypocratic oath).
I understand your frustration at not being able to write about European history; I would give anything to write about the Romanovs!
Thanks, Holly! I actually saw a book on Dr. Mudd in the library today while I was doing research - I'n sure it would be helpful, if you decide to go that route! And believe me, if I'd been given a choice on either European or American history for this paper, you can bet I'd be writing about European history! But I actually get to do both, since I'm also writing a paper for my French Rev class.
DeleteThanks for the comment!
Congrats on finding a satisfying topic! You seem to be taking a micro-approach to history, so I am interested to see what conclusion you can draw from your research on a macro-level. No doubt you will excel in this, good luck!
ReplyDeleteThanks, Tusa! I'm super excited for the research on this - the Lincoln assassination has always fascinated me, and reading more about it is just making me more and more excited.
DeleteGood luck on the topic Angeline! Seems like it will be pretty interesting. It was entertaining to read the process of how you narrowed your topic, which you seemed to have done quite well.
ReplyDeleteThanks for the comment, TJ! I think your's is going to be really fun, too - after that debate, I couldn't take any more Cold War! I still find it fascinating, though. Choosing the topic was really hard, but I figured that wine growing (and specifically, wine forgery, which is the one book on Jefferson's wine that I already have access to) was slightly too specific to find enough sources on. :)
DeleteGood luck on your paper!