Pages

Sunday, October 12, 2014

"Mickey Mouse" History: How Disney Parks Portray the Past

Pretty much everyone I knew growing up had been to a Disney Park. It was either Disney World or Disneyland (or, if you were one of the lucky ones, both of them) or EPCOT, which, for kids my age, was not nearly as cool as the princesses and princes at the Magic Kingdom. Growing up, though, we never recognized that Disney was attempting to show us history. 

My parents, on the other hand, remember Disney in a much different fashion. They remember Disney films on everything from history to biology being shown in classrooms in their middle schools and high schools. Disney's attempts to educate were much more obvious then.

Now, however, it is much different. My generation did not grow up watching educational films on America created by Walt Disney and his corp of Imagineers; instead, we grew up on Disney's animated princes and princesses and his marvelous theme parks. These theme parks were Walt Disney's way to reinterpret history as he wanted to see it. 

There is an important distinction that should be made before I continue this post. There are two Walt Disneys, according to Mike Wallace's Mickey Mouse History: Original Walt, who is Walt Disney himself, and Corporate Walt, who is the WED Enterprises, Inc. Corporate Walt took over for Original Walt after Disney's death in 1966, and has operated ever since. 

It was Original Walt who conceived the idea for the Disney Parks in California and, later, Florida. He  created a place which was "clean, wholesome, and altogether different from the seedy carnivals he remembered from his youth" (Wallace 135). Here, Disney built his own version of history, starting with Main Street, the first place visitors come to when entering a Disney Park. 

Main Street, USA at Walt Disney World, Orlando, Florida
"It is a happy street," writes Wallace, "clean and tidy, filled with prancing Disney characters. It has a toylike quality...It is like playing in a walk-in doll's house that is simultaneously a shopper's paradise, equipped with dozens of little old-time shops with corporate logos tastefully affixed" (135-6). Supposedly, Main Street is based on the main street of Disney's childhood hometown of Marceline, Missouri; looking at Disney's actual life history (a childhood of displacement and perambulation across America) shows this to be false. Instead, Wallace points out, Main Street, USA, is Disney's idea of what Main Street should be like. "Original Walt's approach to the past," Wallace writes, "was thus not to reproduce it, but to improve it [author's italics]" (136). Imagineers call this "Disney Realism," "where we carefully program out all the negative, unwanted elements and program in the positive elements" (Wallace 137). 

Disney also embraced this perfected view of history in the Hall of Presidents. A brief video elaborating on the Constitution and the threats it had faced in the past is followed by a display of animatronic presidents, moving and talking about their presidencies. 

The Hall of Presidents
Wallace points out that each president is portrayed with a degree of detail "characteristic of Hollywood costume dramas" (139). The audience is held in rapt attention by the presidents, occasionally whispering as famous names are mentioned. When Nixon is spotlighted, however, "chortles and guffaws break out" because, as Wallace notes, "The contrast between the official history and living memories is too great...and the spell snaps under the strain." Wallace, after leaving the show, asked a worker if it had just been a bad day for Nixon, and was told in reply "that no, the crowd always rumbles when RN takes a bow" (139). 

This problem of connection between past and present led to Corporate Walt's creation in 1982 of EPCOT and its American Adventure. 

The American Adventure, EPCOT
The American Adventure departs from the history portrayed at the Magic Kingdom in that it includes African-Americans, women, and Native Americans. It follows American history, as narrated by (animatronic) Mark Twain and Benjamin Franklin, covering everything from the American Revolution to the lunar landing. Despite including groups that had been excluded or portrayed in an unflattering light in the Magic Kingdom, it still glosses over the parts of history that Corporate Disney found distasteful, including the complete elimination of the Vietnam War and the fights for union rights. While it is a step in the right direction, it still holds back.

What Disney history (or, as Wallace terms it, "Mickey Mouse" history) reveals is the desire to teach while entertaining, and improve while appearing to teach the truth. This is similar to what happened in Hollywood in the 1930s and 1940s, as America struggled to find a true national heritage. By creating his own version of America, Disney commodified American history, turning it into something that could be bought and sold. It becomes an idea to be passed on to future generations - an idealization, instead of the actuality. 

What Disney promotes is a perfected idea of the past - a glossy magazine cover, with no problems, no ills, no issues of race or gender. It's a beautiful dream, but it remains just that - a perfected dream. 

8 comments:

  1. Well written and very detailed! I love that you included pictures with this post. They helped explain what you was talking about, such as Main street!

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Thanks for the comment! I'm glad you enjoyed the post!

      Delete
  2. As always, a very descriptive and informative post. I think it was really cool how you started the introduction with the perspective from your parents and their conception of Disney, and then our generation's perspective of Disney, it opens your eyes

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Thanks, TJ! I've grown up hearing all of those stories from my parents about the Disney educational films, and so it only seemed fitting to share them with this post! I'm glad you enjoyed it!

      Delete
  3. This was one of my favorite one of your blog posts so far! You did a marvelous job of explaining the problems with Disney History and making Wallace's commentary and argument a lot more digestible. Keep up the good work!

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Thanks, Holly! I'm glad you enjoyed the post!

      Delete
  4. Good post, Angeline. You state that you grew up with Disney films that did not try to educate, but is that really true? Are there resent Disney film/characters that have had a historical point of view?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. The Disney films that I grew up watching (and that I still like to go back and watch, now that I'm older) were the ones that centered around a princess and her prince. I talked in an earlier post about my childhood love of Mulan (honestly, I still love Mulan - I think it's one of the best Disney films out there), and the influence I think it had on my becoming a history student. I also loved Pocahontas (despite its glaring historical inaccuracies), and for several years I was a Disney Princess for Halloween every year (until I discovered Harry Potter). The films that my parents remember were in conjunction with the classic princesses and Mickey Mouse films that we watch for entertainment: Walt Disney would walk out, a la Howard Stark in Iron Man 2 (at least that's how my mom described it to me at one point), and discuss in black and white history, biology, and other school subjects. These films were used in a similar manner for them like Bill Nye the Science Guy was used for my generation. When I said that Disney films that I watched did not try to educate, what I meant was that they were not as overt in attempting to pass along a specific message (for example, Mulan does not overtly teach me a lesson about Ancient Chinese battle tactics). I believe that Disney's films do have lessons within them, whether it's learning to accept yourself despite your differences or understand that women are equally as strong as men. However, my intended emphasis was on factual education, and I apologize if this was not clear enough in my original post.

      I think that there are definitely recent Disney films (Mulan and Pocahontas are great examples) that had a historical point of view. However, as I already pointed out, Pocahontas does not exactly do a wonderful job of maintaining historical accuracy, and, while I cannot speak for Mulan (more research would be necessary), it does tend to gloss over some of the darker aspects of the time period it is set in. Other recent films, such as The Princess and the Frog and The Hunchback of Notre Dame, also capture the spirit of their respective settings; however, I'm not sure that I would consider them completely accurate (Hunchback's Paris is much too clean, although this is a common error in Hollywood productions). I think that a problem that all films struggle with (not just Disney) is where to draw the line between full costume drama accuracy and a good story. While the history student in me would appreciate the full accuracy, I understand the desire for a good story, with a simple, easily understood flow, and I think that is where Disney tends to come from,

      Delete